Today’s electric power system is built on a foundation of baseload power, largely coal, nuclear and natural gas, supported by more flexible, predominantly natural gas-powered peaker plants deployed to meet infrequent peak electricity demand and grid flexibility needs. But renewable generation and battery storage have begun to disrupt and upend this legacy fossil-fuel system. For the first time ever, traditional power plants are at risk from replacement by these new, non-polluting energy technologies.
Over the last few years, market analysis from industry experts and the national laboratories has suggested that fossil-fueled peaker plants may be at near-term risk of replacement by battery storage and renewable energy technologies. Through modeling and market trend analysis, experts have found that battery storage and renewable generation may be less expensive to develop and operate than these little used but heavily polluting power plants, while also meeting or exceeding the same performance standards these often decades-old peakers.
This clean energy transition is not just theoretical. It has been proven by rapidly advancing market forces. Several recent utility procurements for peaking capacity favor batteries and renewable generation over traditional peakers on both cost and operational ability. Moreover, replacement is not just an economic or emissions reduction opportunity. Retiring or reducing reliance on these plants could be a major win for environmental justice because of where many of these plants are located.
The more than 1,000 peaker plants in operation across the United States are predominantly located in disadvantaged communities, sited in or near mostly low-income communities and communities of color. (See our interactive peaker plant map to view more details about where these plants are located.) Peaker plants disproportionately emit health-damaging air pollutants – mainly ozone forming chemicals like nitrogen oxides (NOx) and harmful particulates – that contribute to poor local air quality and harm public health in these vulnerable frontline communities.
Replacing peaker plants in disadvantaged communities represents one of the most important environmental justice opportunities in the country. It can serve as a model for how new energy technologies can be used now – not years from now – to help communities take charge of their energy future to end our reliance on these outdated and dirty plants and to stop the construction of new ones. There is no reason that clean peaker replacement technologies, like batteries and solar, cannot be distributed broadly throughout these communities, where they can benefit local businesses and residents through savings, revenue generation, and improved resilience.
In turn, this peaker strategy can demonstrate how longer-term efforts involving energy storage and renewable technologies can begin to incrementally replace, longer duration baseload fossil-fuel plants. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that about 30 percent of all new planned gas buildout will be peaker plants (7 gigawatt of gas peakers compared to 16.5 gigawatts of baseload gas plants). While peakers don’t operate as much as baseload plants, they are far less efficient and could account for around 20 percent of gas burned in all proposed new gas power plants. Replacement of peaker plants could create the foundation for this necessary struggle to end use of fossil fuels to make electricity.
Clean Energy Group’s Energy Storage Peaker Replacement (ESPR) initiative is a collaborative effort in partnership with local community and environmental justice groups to fight and win peaker plant replacement battles. ESRP is developing the analytical basis and strategies to support policy and local advocacy efforts to replace new and existing fossil-fuel peaker power plants with battery storage and other clean energy technologies nationwide. It is the first effort in the country to systematically analyze and target traditional peaker plants at scale.
The devastating California wildfires and related power outages are already leading to new approaches to energy resiliency that rely on battery storage technologies. This past week, a new model has emerged to accelerate the adoption of solar and storage systems for resilient power.
https://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/kincade-fire-NOAA-1.jpg330480Maria Blais Costellohttps://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Clean-Energy-Group-logo-275x70.pngMaria Blais Costello2019-11-07 11:34:332020-01-03 11:09:28California Power Shut-Offs Drive Customers to Solar and StorageDennis Schroeder/NREL
From Florida to Nevada to California, big battery projects have been making headlines lately. But a more groundbreaking movement has received far less media attention – hundreds, in some cases thousands, of small distributed solar and battery systems working together to tackle power plant-sized problems.
https://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/NREL-powerwall-photo-Dennis-Schroeder.jpg330480Clean Energy Grouphttps://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Clean-Energy-Group-logo-275x70.pngClean Energy Group2019-06-24 15:00:282020-01-03 11:10:19Small Solar and Battery Storage Systems are Toppling Power Plants
How storage will power a low carbon energy transformation has begun to emerge across the country – surprisingly led by utilities in the Midwest and West as they pursue an economic mix of renewables and battery storage to shut down and replace existing fossil-fuel plants.
https://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Energy-Storage-Syst-215749876-Copy.jpg330480Clean Energy Grouphttps://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Clean-Energy-Group-logo-275x70.pngClean Energy Group2018-12-11 09:55:392019-02-01 16:17:33Batteries Replacing Gas in California, Coal in Colorado and Indiana